Bridgeport Police Department

I know what you're saying. Put yourself in my shoes I do not know who the *** they're talking about.

The fact is before and after I turn myself in at the police station, I was in the dark. I knew nothing about this BS. I had no questions answered. I only know what I know about this case by picking up the report (s) from the court!

And then picking up its fictitious reports at the police station, I was never at this girl's house or school etc. I've never been questioned about this case not by the police or the court as far as I know they pick my name out of a Hat. Easily verified look at the day, date and time that I'd turn myself in and then look at when my disability staff bonded me out, keeping in mind that the courthouse is maybe 5 or 10 minutes around the block from the police station with that said ask the court Ga2 located at 172 Golden Hill Street Bridgeport Connecticut for a copy of the security footage for that day and time and I will guarantee on it you will see me and my staff picking up the warrant for my arrest, not to mention I had to sign my name and show identification of who I was in order to pick it up - which also backs up everything else I've said; about these lying Brady cops falsifying records and lying to superior court judges; they can even get the video footage from the police station it will say the same thing I'm saying. I don't know why I'm even bothered with this nonsense.

I wasn't even there. I am Not guilty. The allegations that were placed on me are false. I don't know who it is and I know for a fact it wasn't me.

I have proof of my whereabouts on the days that they're allegedly saying I was in the area; and then I have documented proof showing that when I was in Bridgeport, I was there for a reason. I've said this before and I will continue to say it, I know for a fact that this was not me and these allegations don't even make any sense, just look at the allegation that they say that the person had facial hair. Not a day in my life have I ever had facial hair and I have pictures and documentation to prove that. I am well documented with the state for my advocacy work.

And to have these false charges put against me is completely outrageous. Case and point - I wrote over 50 emails to my attorney, I wrote letters to the judge in the court, fax, emails and in verbal words my Dr. and even their own doctors are saying the same things and we had meetings with them being some of my eyewitnesses who there also saying the same things I'm saying and it’s not being heard and that’s on top of giving them everything including State and Gov paperwork and doctor's notes and there still pushing it off on a Sec. 54/56 you might as well call it a Sec.

54-56d. same concept. idea, belief, opinion, view, impression - No matter what you call it’s the same.

let's use his disability as our crutch to cover up the police perjury What would you do in my position - especially when the court and the attorneys that are supposed to be your voice are pushing it off on being cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs when I'm not and I back of what I say? Craig

Keep the faith. *** police really should be turned in by their own. They just embarrass the department and all the real heroes.

Being wrongfully accused due to disability prejudice Your Honor, I'm pleading with you to put an end to this, it’s been over three years, and it's taking its toll on me, my documented disability care services, and my job as a disability advocate for children and young adults. For example, supported employment and what the court reported to the media about this case have both been extremely damaging to me and my work.

I'm not attempting to promote myself but rather put an end to this. You have to live it to know it and understand it. The court has put my disability and its services on trial in a big way, and I feel threatened as a result. "How did the girl get your license plate number?" I've been asked since the beginning.

My standard response has always been that she didn't. The cops did what the cops did during a bogus traffic stop on December 20th, at 11 a.m. on the opposite side of town from where the incident occurred and miles away from her alleged school. and put my license plate number in the wrong place.

According to the paperwork that Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462, of the Bridgeport, CT, police department filed with the court that I received from the court, that is not her school district and not her home address, as referenced below. Because I am not an attorney, my attorney can handle it. As a result, I filed a motion to suppress the evidence. September 6th.

Below Take into account the dates and times. That being said, they can make it appear any way they want in the bench warrant for my arrest and its reports by twisting it, but it's not going to change the facts. 1.Alleged photo of the suspects’ car My car, contrary to what Jeffrey Holtz of the Bridgeport, CT, police department claimed, was not a Ford Mustang GT convertible like the one in the picture. But Jeffrey Holtz forged records to tell a judge that the car was mine even though it wasn't, using Photoshop to alter a picture of a Ford Mustang GT convertible that he downloaded from the internet that had no one inside and no license plate number visible.

2.example according to the Ford Mustang GT photo type of file: The JPG File (.jpg) was created and last modified on December 19, 2019. 3.With that said, here's the link to the photo of the car that was reported to be mine. Click on the link: http://***/colors/car/57440***-*.html What do you call it when it's a set-up in comparison to what was allegedly my car? 4.Camile Dejesus phone call, The MP3 file was created on January 14, 2020, at 12:01 p.m.

5.The WAV file in Ramos' interview on Catherine Street was apparently modified on March 7, 2017 at 10:03 a.m. Keep in mind that the recordings themselves could be older. according to the recording (Ramos interview on Catherine Street) Jeffrey Holtz is heard 20 minutes into the recording telling the alleged witnesses and alleged victim that they (the police) were the ones who got the license plate number of my car on December 20th, which contradicts the warrant for my arrest and reports everything regardless of the dates and times, and it clearly demonstrates that everything I've mentioned in my motions, letters, and spoken statements is correct. Penal Code 118.1 makes it illegal for police officers to file a false report.

I have provided solid and obvious proof. I've established my innocence and supported it with facts and eyewitness testimony; I'm requesting that my case be nolle dismissed or transferred to a different court. I am not being treated fairly. For example, on January 11th.

three years after the fact, the reason offered to me and my disability staff for another extension until February 8th, was that they were now changing the dates of the documented occurrences and when they claimed these incidents occurred. When I've previously demonstrated that they're false. I stand by my "Motion to Suppress Evidence" dated September 6, and all its additional information and facts. I will include According to the incident report for December 20, an alleged bolo came out of a suspect's car on December 19th.

The car in the photo was not mine, and it is also in my motion to suppress evidence. the police in the records and the description, everything goes all over the place. For instance, in the warrant for my arrest, the suspect was described as having facial hair, whereas I didn't have any. That being said, they can make it appear any way they want in the bench warrant for my arrest and its reports by twisting it, but it's not going to change the facts.

as an example. "On November 8, on Ramos Catherine Street, someone allegedly said, "excuse me" or "yo" and was ignored, according to the bench warrant for my arrest and its alleged accusations," it says in the warrant. • for example. "On Ramos Catherine Street, the audio recording doesn’t say anything about what happened." It simply describes a guess based on hearsay, according to the recording, in its comments, no matter what it may be (reference below the investigation) on December 21.

• as an illustration: It wasn't in the alleged victim statements or the recording, but it was used as a justification in the warrant for my arrest, along with "Did you ever beep your horn at a woman?" which wasn't in the report or the recording; no one ever said anyone beeped at them, but it was used as a justification in the warrant for my arrest. The case against me, as well as a Photoshop image of a car that wasn't mine and the fact that the victim identified the suspect as having facial hair while I didn't, has never been called into question in over three years. Neither has the fact that I was never given a Miranda warning. Fact: Also, according to the bench warrant for my arrest and the police incident report, it looked like a Ford Mustang allegedly matching the description of my car was harassing schoolgirls at dismissal time.

Look at the facts. I was pulled over on the east side, nowhere near this girl, on December 20th, for allegedly running a traffic light at 11 a.m., and according to the police incident report for December 20th, a Ford. Mustang "harassed" schoolgirls at dismissal time, and the application for a warrant for my arrest was issued on December 27th, along with its reports on the same day. • "If they had my license plate number before December 20th, they wouldn't have waited over a month to talk to someone or do something about it." • For example, I received the call a few days after the 20th of December and had no idea why.

I requested that an attorney be present during questioning and was denied. The next thing I knew, in January I found out there was a warrant out for my arrest, and to my surprise, it was for stalking in the third, so I turned myself in and went to court. • When I appeared in court, the prosecution upgraded the charge to first-degree stalking and added the charge of risk of injury to a child because I had been denied that right. • And the prosecution has receipts from VIP Wash Lube on Main Street in Bridgeport proving why I was there on that day and time.

and, once again, they have an AutoZone receipt on north Ave for where I was going and went; I was never around this girl. "With that being said," I've already submitted my motion to suppress evidence on September 6, 2022, and I stand by everything I've said in it. and all of its additional information and facts.With that being said, the data in my case does not add up. Don't allow anyone to say I didn't say it.

• According to court filings, the date of birth of Iyonna Ramos is December 13, her home address is Catherine St., Bridgeport, CT; and her school is a basic high school. It doesn't add up. I'm requesting that the state's evidence against me be thoroughly reviewed, including both recordings and the vehicle photo. Complete file and folder change monitoring: who changed the file or folder name, when the changes were done, I stand by my motion to suppress evidence and all of its comments date September 6th, About me • Just as no two people are exactly alike, no two brain injuries are exactly alike.

When will disability prejudice be a thing of the past? I'm qualified to make these claims because I participated in the Connecticut acquired brain injury (ABI) class action lawsuit, which is how the state of Connecticut implemented the ABI waiver for individuals like me. These exact same biases and government ignorance served as the basis for the class-action lawsuit. The only difference is that back then they called it Connecticut General Statutes 54–56d, "Competency to Stand Trial," and put you in a psychological hospital, hence the class action lawsuit.

Click here: https://***/case/439/ I won't go much into this bias; instead, I'll just say a few things. Due to my advocacy work and involvement in both local and national movements for all brain injury survivors, I will say this: This case confirms what I have told every staff member at the US Senate, White House, and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, over the years, and it demonstrates how easy it is for states to exploit and discriminate against someone. like me.

At the end of the day, no matter how it's put, I cannot receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction where the matter is pending. • On January 11th, after three years of not being able to speak up for myself, not having been asked any questions about this case, etc. and being completely disregarded, I made it happen on 1-11, and it's now on record. Why do I need a program, etc.

for something I had nothing to do with? I am not guilty; I wasn't there. With all due respect What part of this do you not comprehend? That being said If you recall, honorable Judge McShane, your remarks in court on January 11, regarding a 54-56 case and point, what you said After I spoke, which proved my point with respect, I just don't see it that way.

Having a documented disability implied that you wanted to blame their perjury on me because of my condition and exploit it to cover it. up. See below. Case CR20-January 11th State of Connecticut v CS Honorable Judge If it may please the court my name is CS, I don't know why I'm even being bothered with this harassment.

I wasn't there. I supplied data and eyewitness accounts to back it up. I am not guilty. The allegations that were placed against me are false.

I don’t know who it is, and I know for a fact it wasn’t me. I have proof of my whereabouts on the days that they’re allegedly saying I was in the areas, and then I have documented proof showing that when I was in Bridgeport, I was there for a reason. I’ve said this before, and I will continue to say it. I know for a fact that this was not me, and these allegations don’t even make any sense.

Just look at the allegation that they make that the person had facial hair. whereas I didn't have any, and I have pictures and documentation to prove that. I am well documented in the state for my advocacy work. And to have these false charges brought against me is completely outrageous.

I’m not sure how many times I have to defend myself and my rights. I have provided solid and obvious proof. I've established my innocence and supported it with facts and eyewitness testimony; I'm requesting that my case be dismissed or transferred to a different court. I am not being treated fairly.

In my "Motion to Suppress Evidence" dated September 6, I add further information. On March 1, three years later, the case was a nolle, as they had no witnesses.

I would suggest anyone out there who has a criminal or civil case involving the Bridgeport Police Department, and especially Jeffrey Holtz, badge # 40462, is involved in your case, hire a competent and private attorney to look into your case. If you or your loved one has already been convicted and these officers are involved in the case, I would file an appeal and have it reopened.